Replacing the irreplaceable

August 25th, 2010  |  Published in Ian-ything Goes  |  8 Comments

Football can be a real b**** sometimes. Less than a year ago, some Manchester United fans were wondering if Paul Scholes, the “ginger-haired ninja” (and why ninja, I’ll never know) should just fall on his own sword and call it quits.

But after his two man-of-the-match performances a couple of weeks ago, it seemed like everybody’s favourite asthmatic footballer was about to be given the status of saint – the British media had everyone from Roy Keane to Zinedine Zidane to a member of the Middleton Cricket Club (where Scholes played as a kid) to say something nice about him.

And you know you’re going just a teensy bit overboard with the praise when you say “Paul Scholes can tackle”, which Keane inexplicably did. Apparently he just “mistimes a few”. Maybe Keano was just being funny, but does Roy Keane EVER have a laugh? About tackling? Not likely.

Anyway, it would’ve been cool if they did make Scholes a saint, not least because of the fact that it would make him St Paul; and it doesn’t matter that Arsene Wenger thinks Scholesy has a little Anakin Skywalker in him. To listen to a man whose team has clocked up 72 red cards in 14 seasons (actually it’s 12 seasons… didn’t realise the list I found doesn’t include 2009/2010…) talk about others having a “dark side” is about as laughable as Yaya Toure lecturing young footballers about how the beautiful game is not about the money whilst banking in his £220,000-a-week salary.

Wenger’s boys might have been pretty good (they’ve done VERY well in the Fair Play league) over the last few seasons, but before that, they were definitely the bad boys of the Prem… Compared to Patrick Vieira, Scholes is a veritable saint.

But back to Scholes. Everybody’s been going on and on about how he is simply irreplaceable. The English national side are seeing evidence of that with every game Steven Gerrard and Frank Lampard “play” together, as are United with every game he does play for them.

But as a wise woman once said, “don’t you ever for a second get to thinking … you’re irreplaceable.” Beyonce’s words became almost prophetic in hindsight as Scholes was shunted – to the left, of England’s midfield – towards the end of his international career to accommodate younger talents.

So in a way, England were able to replace him. Few could argue with the merits of choosing the dynamic Gerrard or the uber-consistent Lampard over an ageing Scholes at the time – it just took them a few years to realise they shouldn’t have chose them together.

The question now is whether United will be able to replace him when the dreaded day of his retirement comes.

To answer that question, and I know this comes pretty close to blasphemy for United fans, I thought I’d list down a few young midfielders who might be capable of replacing the sacred St Paul:

Cesc Fabregas

His is the first name that springs to mind. At the same point in his career, Scholes was often playing as a withdrawn striker, so one could argue that for Fabregas to have been pulling the strings from midfield all these years puts him even ahead of Scholes. There are few who can pass the ball around with the same precision and ease as Scholes, but Fabregas is one of them.

Possibility of joining United? Just a bit more likely than Carlos “Caveman” Tevez making an emotional, tearful run-out in red at Old Trafford.

James Milner

He’s young, he’s energetic, he can pass the ball around decently, he scores goals from midfield, and he’s English. Seems like a perfect fit for United, until you consider that he’s a Manchester City player now.

Possibility of joining United? Zero, now that he’s chosen money over common sense.

Mesut Ozil

Ozil was the one player most United fans wanted to sign on with the team, usually with replacing Scholes as the main reason.

But people need to remember – Real Madrid’s latest signing has had one good tournament, and that was within a brilliant system with the German national team. He could still very well be a flash in the pan or, like Lukas Podolski and Miroslav Klose, just particularly good playing for his national side.

He’s an exceptional talent, no doubt about that. But we’ll have to wait and see if he can produce the goods at the highest level of club competition.

Possibility of joining United? When (not if) Jose Mourinho joins United, he might just bring Oz along as well!

Yoann Gourcuff

Personally, the Frenchman would be my pick to join United. He’s proven himself at club level, is physically built for the Premier League, and has that bit more flair than Ozil.

He is a slightly different player than Scholes in that his passing isn’t exactly his strongest suit. It’s his skill on the ball that gets him into positions to make passes.

United could sure do with his skills in midfield now, seeing as they already have accomplished passers of the ball in Darren Fletcher, and Michael Carrick, laugh as you may.

Possibility of joining United? Much higher than the rest. This will be his last season with Bordeaux, that is if his club can keep his suitors away before the transfer window closes.

*** UPDATE *** It seems Gourcuff is on his way to Lyon in a 22 million euro transfer. Sigh…

Anderson

Finally, United can also look within their own ranks for a replacement. Like Gourcuff, passing isn’t the biggest part of Anderson’s game. He doesn’t ping the ball around like Scholes, Fabregas or Xavi, but he has skill, good balance, and a whole lot of running in him.

His progress has been slowed in recent years by a succession of injuries plus a little spat with Alex Ferguson; but Fergie recently spoke up about what a “wonderful player” he is, and that he would get his chance this season to mend their bridges by proving himself worthy of replacing Scholes.

Fergie also reported that his recovery is on schedule, so United fans could very well witness the coming-of-age of Scholes’ successor this season.

Responses

  1. Yem Tanaka says:

    August 25th, 2010at 3:55 pm(#)

    Dear Ian,
    I don’t think all names mentioned above could replace Scholes except for James Milner,because he is English..but one name keep rolling in my mind.By chance,do you know Javi Martinez of Alhletic Bilbao?He is part of Spain’s WC winning team and i think his style of play suits Man United and give options for Sir Alex in midfield and he can play either as a defensive or attacking midfielder..he just played one game at the WC bit he is developing into a world class performer.No wonder lah Barcelona keeps tab on him..

  2. ian says:

    August 25th, 2010at 4:27 pm(#)

    Dear Yem Tanaka,

    Yes, I have heard about Javi Martinez, and checked out quite a few of his clips on YouTube too =P Looks like a top, top player. He’s Rio Ferdinand’s height I think, but much stronger and with very good technique. He’ll cost quite a bit though… Better buy him now while Barca doesn’t have the mone =P

  3. Lau says:

    August 26th, 2010at 2:03 pm(#)

    Mikel Arteta Or Morten Gamst Pedersen

  4. zul says:

    August 26th, 2010at 2:05 pm(#)

    agree

  5. noobie says:

    August 26th, 2010at 5:25 pm(#)

    Scholes has the footballing brains that so many players actually don’t. His vision, his ability to read games, the ability to conjure perfect passes, and his shooting is simply a talent in a million. Only the Spanish trio of Fab, Xavi and Iniesta are in the same league as Scholes today. The rest, meh.

  6. Chip says:

    August 30th, 2010at 6:57 pm(#)

    Would’ve thought that SAF’s retirement would be more of a worry to United fans, no?

  7. ian says:

    September 9th, 2010at 2:27 pm(#)

    Lau: Arteta wouldn’t be a bad choice, but I think Pedersen is better as a winger. Both are good players though =)

    Noob: Totally agree! The only reason I wrote this was to find the next best thing to replace Scholesy. What a talent!
    I didn’t include Xavi because of space restrictions. He was the only old-ish player in the list, so I thought I should omit him and make it all about young players who could possibly replace Scholes.
    Xavi is a bit different though. He doesn’t play as many long balls as Scholes. He usually passes it around on the deck. And he’s not as dynamic as Scholes in terms of runs into the box and scoring. But he’s definitely just as effective, though.
    I’d say Fabregas is the most similar to Scholes out of that Spanish trio. Iniesta is more effective in an advanced role because of his dribbling.

    Chip: Don’t worry, Mourinho will take over! Hahahahaha… But seriously, I’m not as worried because I think he will outlast Scholes. Sir Alex be healthy for a while more. But if Mourinho doesn’t take over, I think United will face a period of decline. No one else can follow up what SAF has achieved apart from Mourinho… We’ll just have to wait and see.

  8. ian says:

    September 9th, 2010at 2:38 pm(#)

    BTW, there was a post on Twitter saying I didn’t do my research because Ozil plays in a different position from Scholes… I know he plays in a more advanced role for Germany, and back when he was with Bremen as well, but Scholes played in a similar position earlier in his United career too.

    Ozil was touted as a replacement for Scholes because it was believed that he could make the transition to a central midfield role with his passing ability, just like Scholes did. Sir Alex himself admitted that he was in the market for Ozil.

    And as for the Gourcuff deal, it was done after press time, meaning I already submitted the story and there was no way to change it. The deal was only reported the evening before the column was published, and I don’t write for the news sections so our press times are a bit different – we have to submit our stuff earlier. All I could do was put an update in my blogpost here. In any case, Gourcuff can still replace Scholes a year or two from now =P

Leave a Response

Featured Bloggers

Be part of the R.AGE community. Each week, we feature three young bloggers on the R.AGE blog to share their thoughts and musings.

Highlights


Join us on Facebook!

Twitter (@thestar_rage)

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter